Most of the books in my dad’s study captured exactly none of my interest when I was 13. But tucked in among the financial how-to books and guides to wines and operas, one blue paperback caught my eye one day. On the back was a pretty, intense brunette with piercing eyes. On the front, the all-capital words LINDA GOODMAN’S SUN SIGNS.

“How to really know your husband, wife, lover, child, boss, employee, yourself – through astrology,” promised the cover. Astrology? I knew my sun sign was Libra, but nothing more than that. I took the book off the shelf and turned to my sign’s section.

How to Recognize Libra

Librans hate to be rude, yet they’ll straighten the crooked picture on your wall and snap off your blaring TV set. Librans love people, but they hate large crowds. Like gentle doves of peace, they go around mediating and patching up quarrels between others; still they enjoy a good argument themselves…

I read on. Extremely intelligent, yet gullible. Restless, but rarely hurried. A face like a box of chocolates. In short, a mass of contradictions behind a Brigitte Bardot smile. (Or possibly a Dwight Eisenhower smile. “You have to make allowances,” Linda warned with a wink.)

Her portrait of Libra didn’t suit me at all. It did describe someone I wanted to be. Invariably pretty? Harmonious and brilliant? Never without a boyfriend? Wow, I won the zodiac lottery! So what if we Librans also suffer from chronic mood swings and can’t make a decision without consulting our sweeties? For that matter, so what if I was actually bookish, introverted, and chronically timid around boys, and would sooner shrink into the earth than argue my case? I was hooked.

Clearly, the book’s appeal wasn’t the infallible accuracy of its descriptions. I believe that, once we’re told what we are supposed to be like, courtesy of Linda Goodman’s Sun Signs or any system of personality classification, some of us naturally tend to start conforming to that description. We nod furiously in recognition of the parts that rhyme with what we know (or believe) about ourselves, and shrug and skip over whatever doesn’t match. “I’m a Scorpio, I can’t help it if I’m secretive.” We’ve all heard that. Whereas I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone say, “I’m a Scorpio, I can’t help it if I’m the life of the party.”

What piqued my curiosity was that, even as Linda wittily described the penchants and predilections of Virgo men (Dad), Taurus women (Mom), and Gemini friends (my best friend), she would slip in these sly, subtle references to something beyond sun signs alone. “Most [Libra women] are about as female as the average man can stand (unless there’s an aggressive ascendant),” she’d write. Or, “This antipathy to making a decision can turn into quite a stalemate with [Librans] who have adverse afflictions between their planets at birth.”

What? The other planets were relevant, too? And what did she mean by “an aggressive ascendant”? That was my first hint that there was something more to astrology. If I couldn’t claim to be Linda Goodman’s typical Libran, I reasoned, maybe it had something to do with my Moon, or my ascendant, or any of a number of other factors. No wonder all Libras weren’t identical – there was a whole deck of planets to shuffle and deal out, and my hand was different from everyone else’s. I was determined to learn more about the astrology beyond the sun signs, to find out what made me different, special, unique.

The next summer at camp, I had the good luck to take an astrology class with a college student who taught us how to calculate birth charts by hand. We used a paperback Rosicrucian ephemeris and tables of diurnal planetary motion from the American Federation of Astrologers. I learned to calculate Placidus house cusps, draw up a chart, insert planets, and do some cookbook-style analysis. It was just the rabbit hole I was hoping to tumble down. There was no turning back. (Okay, there was a turning back at my Saturn return that lasted five years, but that’s a tale for another time.)

I never asked how a book like Linda Goodman’s Sun Signs came to be in the possession of my father, a scientist and businessman with a love of art and music but not, as far as I can tell, of the occult. But I’ll always think fondly of the role it played in my youth and beyond. Whatever its actual merits as an astrology text, it’s still the original signpost that pointed me down this path.

To the late, lovely Linda Goodman, the self-proclaimed triple Aries who turned me and millions on to astrology, happy birthday today, April 9th. I raise my Mars bar to your memory.

12 Responses to “To Linda Goodman, my first astrology teacher: Happy birthday”

  1. Amy Herring Says:

    Nicely written! I can understand an appreciation for Linda Goodman that, if I can be so bold but hopefully not cruel, does not revolve around her astrological skill, but perhaps her poetry or just the role she played in drawing others to the craft.

    In 1995 I came across a community education class on astrology in Utah, of all places, and even though the class was so-so, I bought the book they recommended and read the entire thing that night. And there definitely was no looking back.


  2. Thank you, Amy! Really glad you liked it.

    Yes, I think LG was more of a poet than an astrologer – but even then, she had some sense of the story, I suppose.

    Now I’m off to see what you posted about NORWAC. :-)

  3. Monica Says:

    Christine — I don’t know if you read my About page on Astrology Mundo, but Linda Goodman was also my first astrology teacher. I also learned to cast charts by hand from a mentor. It wasn’t at summer camp; it was at a mental hospital for troubled teens, where I ended up when Saturn was on my Moon in 1974. My astrology teacher, a psychiatric aide, was a Virgo whose Sun was on my North Node in the Twelfth House of hospitals and institutions.
    Interesting that your Saturn return caused you to turn your back on astrology. In my case, it was the exact opposite. Glad you’re back in the fold. I’m really enjoying your excellent blog on the oft-neglected area of horary astrology. Keep up the good work!


  4. Monica, come to think of it, I *did* see that about Linda Goodman on your About page – very glad you found your way to my birthday tribute to her. And I’m over the moon ;-) that you’re enjoying the blog. Thanks for reading and commenting!


  5. Hi Christine
    I’m an astrologer too and I have found conflicting data for Linda Goodman. Astrotheme.fr give her birthday as 10 Apr 1925 with a time of 1.56pm which gives her an Asc of 22.11 Leo and Moon in Scorpio tightly conjunct Saturn. Wikipedia also give 10th Apr. An unknown source of data gives 9th Apr at 8.23 am which gives an Asc of 9 Gemini and Moon in Libra. Any ideas on how we can verify correct data? Would be grateful to anyone who can! thanks
    Joanna


  6. Hi, Joanna, and thanks for stopping by!

    I think Goodman was circumspect about her real birth data her entire life, so it’s no surprise you’ve found conflicting information. It’s also possible that, when she called herself a “triple Aries,” she didn’t necessarily mean Aries Sun/Moon/ASC.

    You could ask the folks at http://www.astrodatabank.com for her data, though they may instruct you to buy their software at US$199 (see http://www.astrologysoftwareshop.com/astrodatabank.asp for more info). At the very least, maybe they’ll tell you whether their data for Goodman is birth-certificate accurate or just DD (“dirty data”), or somewhere in between.

    Happy hunting, and let me know what you learn.


  7. thanks for the feedback – I had read that about her secrecy around her data so I suspect this is going to be a bit of a wild goose chase. Good idea to check with Lois Rodden site tho – if anyone has it checked out it will be them and I’ll certainly post back if I can find what they say without having to pay $199 for the info! Does anyone reading this have the software package? I’ve checked on the site and she is included under Famous People – thanks.
    ps Christine how can I contact you directly re my Greek Island Summer School for astrology and tarot?


  8. Thank you, Joanna, I’ve already found your website :-)

  9. jordan Says:

    Hi, I have also followed in your steps and have had a passion for linda Goodman’s writtings. She had a way with words for such a subject as this didn’t she…and she knew what the hell she was talking about. I have pondered about her moon sign and the mystery of it all. I do believe it would be scorpio because of the secretivness. But its hard to tell a thing like a moon sign for me. I can almost always tell your sun just by having a little time with you. Anyways I was wondering what your moon sign was…If you said I did not read it and was wondering. so what is it Christine you won’t be so secretive will you?


  10. My moon, Jordan? It’s fertile, peregrine, gibbous, double-bodied, cadent, void, and on the Part of Fortune. Does that help? (giggle) A traditional astrologer will know the sign from the first two adjectives. (And if they look closely, this also tells them my sun’s house placement.)

  11. Rob D Says:

    This morning my partner and I toasted with our cup of coffee to LG. We worked with her to finish Gooberz in 1989-90.
    I love that there is so much interest in her still.
    She was a huge influence on me.
    A couple things I would like to say:
    Her books were written to appeal to the masses and get people interested in Astrology—again–she would say.
    Her prowess as an Astrologer was unbelievable. I experienced it first hand with my own chart and for her many clients.

    Also—my friend loved to put out confusing info about her real birthday and the time.
    But trust me it is April 9 and she is a triple Aries.
    Her moon is also fertile—
    My friend Bonnie turned me on to your site— I am glad.
    Happy birthday Linda—


  12. Rob, it’s lovely of you to stop by with your recollections of LG. Thank you so much.


Leave a Reply